I'm sure this was a Grand Champion.
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Fire Season
Well, it's that time of year - when the skies have unwanted activity.
No, not mosquitoes in the bosque (well that too)...I'm talkin' about these big aluminum birds.
Here's one of the Air Tankers based in Albuquerque that's been pressed into service on a wildland fire about 40 miles from Albuquerque.
No, not mosquitoes in the bosque (well that too)...I'm talkin' about these big aluminum birds.
Here's one of the Air Tankers based in Albuquerque that's been pressed into service on a wildland fire about 40 miles from Albuquerque.
Assault Rifles Need to go
From Eugene Robinson - The Washington Post - that paper that the NYC candidate has banned from covering his campaign
The
only reasonable response to the massacre in Orlando is to ban the sale of
military-style assault weapons. All else, I’m afraid, is just noise.
If this
ensconces me in an ideological corner, I’m fine with that. If it insults the
Constitution, so be it — any other response would do far greater harm to our
freedoms. Or we could argue for a while and then do nothing. We’ve tried that
course of action many times, and it doesn’t work.
An
Islamic State sympathizer was able to go into a gun store days
or weeks ago and buy
both a pistol and an AR-15-style semiautomatic assault rifle, which he used to
kill 49 men
and women at the
Pulse nightclub in Orlando. Had he been armed with the pistol alone, he still
would have killed people — but not so many. Keeping military-grade combat
weapons out of the hands of maniacs should not be a controversial idea.
The
Second Amendment enshrines the right to keep and bear arms, and the Supreme
Court has ruled that this is an individual right, not a collective one. The
court has made clear, however, that this does not preclude reasonable gun
control measures. Not all weapons must be considered suitable for private
hands.
When
the framers wrote of “arms,” they were thinking about muskets and single-shot
pistols. They could not have foreseen modern rifles or high-capacity magazines.
They lived at a time when it was impossible to imagine one man barging into a
crowded room and killing more than one or two people before having to reload
and surely being subdued. Today it is not only imaginable but also tragically
commonplace.
No
hunter needs an AR-15 to bring down a deer. None of us needs such a weapon to
defend our families against intruders. And for those who believe assault rifles
offer protection against a hypothetical tyrannical government — or who perhaps
consider the present government tyrannical — I have sobering news: If and when
the black helicopters come, they will be accompanied by tanks.
Why
focus exclusively on the guns? Because other proposed solutions would violate
the letter and spirit of the Constitution — and surely wouldn’t work anyway.
One of
the presidential candidates — I don’t want to sully this column with his name —
has suggested a ban on Muslim immigration. The idea would be laughable if it
were not so dangerously un-American.
First,
it would be useless. The Orlando murderer — I don’t want to use his name,
either — was born not overseas but in New York, just like the presidential
candidate in question. And in the San Bernardino, Calif., killing spree, also
inspired by the Islamic State, the wife was an immigrant but the husband was born
in the United States. The self-radicalization of American citizens
is not going to be solved by banning all believers in Islam from entry.
Which
would be impossible, of course. I suppose immigration officers could ask every
foreign visitor whether he or she is a Muslim, but then what? If the answer is
no, wave them through? Stop them for further questioning if they “look” Muslim,
whatever that means? Don’t you think Islamic State operatives might be smart
enough to have Bibles in their carry-ons rather than Korans?
Attempting
such a prohibition would also be obscene in a nation that enshrines religious
freedom in the First Amendment. Enough said about this loathsome idea.
Another
possible response would involve more vigilant surveillance. The Orlando shooter
had been interviewed by the FBI at
least twice because
of alleged extremist leanings or connections. He was apparently on
a terrorism watch list for a
time but was removed after authorities decided there was no need to keep him
under suspicion.
By all
means, Congress should immediately ban gun sales to anyone on such a watch
list. But that wouldn’t have helped in Orlando. No level of surveillance
remotely permissible under the Constitution would allow authorities to detect
all instances of self-radicalization and act on them. We put people in jail for
what they do, not what they think.
Should
there be universal background checks for gun purchases? Yes, of course. But the
Orlando killer passed a background check. It is not possible to have a free society
without the presumption of innocence.
Freedom is possible,
however, without the right to buy military weapons designed for killing sprees.
Banning them would not end mass killings, but it would mean fewer deaths. If we
do not act, the blood of future victims will be on all of our hands.
Monday, June 13, 2016
Saturday, June 11, 2016
Thursday, June 9, 2016
Thursday Throwback
Well, the political season is maturing.
No longer is it an intraparty fight - now it's on to the big time.
Times have certainly changed from the days when I covered politics for the Big Seven News.
I recall one presidential story - some local reporters were invited to tag along with Morris Udall, the uncle of our present United States Senator, who was running for President of the United States.
It was 1976 - according to Wikipedia - the all knowing website.
Mo was about to campaign in Silver City.
Maybe it was because it was close to his Arizona congressional district.
So, the plane ride was free, and off we went in some "big" propeller powered plane like a Convair-580 (or the like). It was probably something like this - or maybe this plane.
Silver City here we come.
We came to Silver City, we saw, and we returned.
The most memorable part of the trip, other than I was covering a presidential campaign...I got to spend some time with Udall - who had a terrific sense of humor. And I got to spend some time with Bill Plante of CBS News - a practical jokester and fun loving guy assigned to cover the campaign. Plante, who still works at the White House for CBS, was crossing the country with Uncle Mo. They must have gotten along quite well.
It's changed a lot since then. Candidates travel in chartered jet planes. If they're important enough they have security and motorcades have replaced pickups and station wagons.
Reporters and correspondents are kept at arms length from the candidate - instead of playing poker on a cardboard table inside a crowded, bumpy airplane.
I'm not sure the public is better informed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)